Skip to main content
Reviewed model comparisonvideo-same-category-deployment-comparison

Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video vs Wan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video

Compare deployment template, GPU tier, VRAM, base hourly cost, and practical fit for these two video models on ModelPilot.

Base cost delta
+$0.90/hr
VRAM delta
+32GB
Quality checks
6/6

Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video

Generate 3-5 second videos from text prompts. Fast, great for iteration. Runs on A6000.

GPU tier
GPU High VRAM (A6000)
Base rate
$0.49/hr
VRAM
48GB
Template
comfyui-wan-t2v

Wan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video

Cinematic quality text-to-video. Best open-source video model. Requires A100 80GB.

GPU tier
GPU Very High VRAM (A100 80GB)
Base rate
$1.39/hr
VRAM
80GB
Template
comfyui-wan-t2v

Deployment facts

FactorWan 2.2 5B Text-to-VideoWan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video
Model familywan22wan22
Variant5B Text-to-Video14B Text-to-Video
Typevideovideo
Deployment templatecomfyui-wan-t2vcomfyui-wan-t2v
GPU tierGPU High VRAM (A6000)GPU Very High VRAM (A100 80GB)
GPUNVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe
VRAM48GB80GB
vCPU / RAM / disk9 vCPU / 50GB RAM / 200GB disk8 vCPU / 117GB RAM / 300GB disk
Base GPU rate$0.49/hr$1.39/hr
Base 24/7 monthly rate$353/mo$1001/mo
Estimated first deploy18 min18 min
Config sourcewan22-5b-t2vwan22-14b-t2v

Base GPU rates are sourced from the current instance configuration. Final billed price can include ModelPilot service markup and active usage settings.

Cost scenarios

Usage levelHours/moWan 2.2 5B Text-to-VideoWan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video
Prototype40$19.60$55.60
Part-time app160$78.40$222
Always-on720$353$1001

Evidence summary

  • wan22-5b-t2v and wan22-14b-t2v are both video models, so this page compares a real same-category deployment decision rather than unrelated catalog entries.
  • Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video maps to GPU High VRAM (A6000) at $0.49/hr; Wan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video maps to GPU Very High VRAM (A100 80GB) at $1.39/hr.
  • Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video uses comfyui-wan-t2v with comfyui-wan-t2v; Wan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video uses comfyui-wan-t2v with comfyui-wan-t2v.
  • Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video is positioned for Text-to-video generation and Image-to-video animation; Wan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video is positioned for Text-to-video generation and Image-to-video animation.
  • The comparison is generated from ModelPilot's committed modelConfig, modelSeoData, and instanceConfig files so deployment facts stay tied to the product catalog.

Decision matrix

FactorWan 2.2 5B Text-to-VideoWan 2.2 14B Text-to-VideoWinner
Lower base GPU cost$0.49/hr$1.39/hrWan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video
Lower VRAM requirement48GB80GBWan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video
Higher catalog popularity10 score7 scoreWan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video
Cheaper always-on deployment$353/mo$1001/moWan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video
More specific deployment templatecomfyui-wan-t2vcomfyui-wan-t2vTie

FAQ

Which is cheaper to run, Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video or Wan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video?

Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video has the lower base GPU rate in the current ModelPilot config at $0.49/hr before any service markup or usage-specific adjustments.

Which uses less VRAM, Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video or Wan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video?

Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video maps to the lower VRAM tier at 48GB in the current deployment recommendation.

Can both models run through ModelPilot?

Yes. Wan 2.2 5B Text-to-Video uses the comfyui-wan-t2v deployment template and Wan 2.2 14B Text-to-Video uses comfyui-wan-t2v. Check the deploy flow before launch for current template availability and pricing.